Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras

Vol. 49 Núm. SuplEsp (2020)
Articulos de investigación

Vulnerabilidad de los servicios ecosistémicos del área marina protegida Uramba

PDF
Natalia Uribe-Castañeda
Universidad del Valle
Carlos Andres Satizabal
Universidad del Valle
Leonardo Herrera-Orozco
Universidad Icesi
Jaime Ricardo Cantera Kintz
Universidad del Valle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25268/bimc.invemar.2020.49.SuplEsp.1055

Publicado 2020-12-19

Palabras clave

  • amenazas,
  • resiliencia,
  • riesgo,
  • Pacífico colombiano,
  • Pacífico Oriental Tropical

Cómo citar

1.
Uribe-Castañeda N, Satizabal CA, Herrera-Orozco L, Cantera Kintz JR. Vulnerabilidad de los servicios ecosistémicos del área marina protegida Uramba. Bol. Investig. Mar. Costeras [Internet]. 19 de diciembre de 2020 [citado 22 de diciembre de 2024];49(SuplEsp):95-118. Disponible en: https://boletin.invemar.org.co/ojs/index.php/boletin/article/view/1055

Derechos de autor 2020 Natalia Uribe-Castañeda, Carlos Andres Satizabal, Leonardo Herrera-Orozco, Jaime Ricardo Cantera Kintz

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Resumen

Los sistemas marinos y costeros del área marina protegida (AMP) Uramba, así como en el resto del mundo, proporcionan una gran variedad de servicios ecosistémicos (i. e. protección costera, regulación de ciclos geoquímicos o provisión de alimento, etc.). Amenazas naturales y/o antropogénicas (i. e. como la erosión costera, el aumento relativo en el nivel del mar o la sobrepesca) pueden transformar, degradar o limitar el suministro de estos servicios ecosistémicos. Este estudio explora el grado de vulnerabilidad que
presentan los servicios ecosistémicos del AMP Uramba ante las amenazas naturales y antropogénicas presentes. Los métodos incluyen
una revisión bibliográfica, un taller de expertos, trabajo de campo para la validación y la georreferenciación de servicios y amenazas. Para
calcular la vulnerabilidad de los servicios ecosistémicos, se estimó la magnitud de las amenazas, su riesgo y su capacidad de resiliencia. Las amenazas naturales y antropogénicas más frecuentes se encuentran en la región externa del AMP Uramba, en las localidades de Juanchaco,
Ladrilleros y Base Naval. El aumento en el nivel del mar es la amenaza que más podría vulnerar los servicios ecosistémicos del AMP Uramba, incluyendo los siguientes: protección costera en playas arenosas, planos lodosos y manglares; regulación climática en playas arenosas y planos lodosos; recreación y turismo en playas arenosas y manglares; mantenimiento de ciclos de vida en manglares, y provisión de alimentos en planos lodosos. Los servicios ecosistémicos de la costa rocosa están amenazados principalmente por deslizamientos, y en el ecosistema pelágico por la sobrepesca.

PDF

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Agardy, T., J. Alder, P. Dayton, S. Curran, A. Kitchingman, M. Wilson, A. Catenazzi, J. Restrepo, C. Birkeland, S. Blaber, S. Saifullah, G. Branch, D. Boersma, S. Nixon, P. Dugan, N. Davidson, and C. Vorosmarty. 2005. Coastal Systems. 513-549. In: Hassan, R., R. Scholes and N. Ash (Eds.). Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, Volume 1. Findings of the condition and trends working group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Series 1. Island Press, Washington. 47 p.
  2. Aldana-Domínguez, J., C. Montes, M. Martínez, N. Medina, J. Hahn, and M. Duque. 2017. Biodiversity and ecosystem services knowledge in the Colombian Caribbean: progress and challenges. Tropical Conservation Science, 10: 1-41. doi.org/10.1177/1940082917714229
  3. Alongi, D.M. 2008. Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci., 76: 1-13.
  4. Backer, H., J.M. Leppänen, A.C. Brusendorff, K. Forsius, M. Stankiewicz, J. Mehtonen, and T. Haaranen. 2010. HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan: a regional programme of measures for the marine environment based on the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut. Bull., 60(5): 642-649.
  5. Baho, D.L., C.R. Allen, A.S. Garmestani, H.B. Fried-Petersen, S.E. Renes, L. Gunderson, and D.G. Angeler. 2017. A quantitative framework for assessing ecological resilience. Ecol. Soc., 22(3): 17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09427-220317
  6. Barbier, E.B., S.D. Hacker, C. Kennedy, and E.W. Koch. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr., 81(2): 169-193.
  7. Blanco, J.F., E.A. Estrada, L.F. Ortiz, and L.E. Urrego. 2012. Ecosystem-wide impacts of deforestation in mangroves: the Urabá Gulf (Colombian Caribbean) case study. Int. Sch. Res. Notices, 1-14. doi.org/10.5402/2012/958709
  8. Boyd, J. and S. Banzhaf. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ., 63 (2-3): 616-626.
  9. Branch, G., R.C. Thompson, T. P Crowe, J.C. Castilla, O. Langmead and S. Hawkins. 2008. Rocky intertidal shores: Prognosis for the future, In: Polunin, N.V.C. (Ed.), Aquatic Ecosystems: Trends and Global Prospects, 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751790.020
  10. Cantera, J.R. 1991. Etude structurale des mangroves et des peuplements littoraux des deux baies du Pacifique Colombien (Málaga et Buenaventura). Rapport avec les conditions du milieu et les peerturbations anthropiques. These d'Etat Sciences. Université d'Aix-Marseille II, Marseille. 429 p.
  11. Cantera, J.R. 2016. Bioerosion patterns in Tertiary rock cliffs of the Pacific coast of Colombia (Tropical Eastern Pacific). Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Ex. Fis. Nat., 40(155): 288-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.18257/r
  12. Cantera, J.R., R. Neira, and C. Ricaurte. 1998. Bioerosión en la costa Pacífica de Colombia. Fondo José Celestino Mutis. FEN y Tercer Mundo, Bogotá. 133 p.
  13. Cantera, J.R., B.A. Tomassin and P. Arnaud. 1999. Faunal zonation and assemblages in the Pacific Colombian mangroves. J Hydrol, 413: 17-33.
  14. Cantera, J.R., E. Londoño-Cruz, L.M. Mejía-Ladino, L. Herrera-Orozco, C. Satizabal, and N. Uribe- Castañeda. 2013. Environmental Issues of a marine protected area in a tectonic estuary in the Tropical Eastern Pacific: Uramba (Malaga Bay Colombia): context, biodiversity, threats and challenges. Water Resour. Res., 5: 1037-1047. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2013.511109
  15. Castellanos-Galindo, G.A., J.R Cantera, S. Espinosa and L.M. Mejía-Ladino. 2011. Use of local ecological knowledge. scientist’s observations and grey literature to assess marine species at risk in a Tropical Eastern Pacific Estuary. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 21: 37-48.
  16. Chambers, L.G., S.E. Davis, T. Troxler, A. Downey-Wall, J.N. Boyer and L.J. Scinto. 2013. Biogeochemical effects of simulated sea level rise on carbon loss in an Everglades mangrove peat soil. J Hydrol., 726: 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-013-1764-6
  17. Cobo-Viveros, A.M. 2007. Medición de volúmenes de bioerosión debidos a perforación y fauna asociada a este proceso en dos acantilados rocosos terciarios de la Bahía de Buenaventura, Pacifico colombiano. Tesis preg. Biol., Univ. Valle, Cali. 128 p.
  18. Cobo-Viveros, A.M. and J.R. Cantera-Kintz. 2015. Main factors determining bioerosion patterns in rocky cliffs in a drowned valley estuary in the Colombian Pacific (Tropical Eastern Pacific). Geomorphology, 246: 220-231.
  19. Coll, M., A.C. Fonseca y J. Cortés. 2001. El manglar y otras asociaciones vegetales de la laguna de Gandoca. Limón, Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop., 49(2): 321-329
  20. Cork, S. 2010. Resilience of social-ecological systems. In: Resilience and transformation: preparing Australia for uncertain futures. Csiro, Melbourne. 205 p.
  21. Costanza, R., R. de Groot, M. Grasso, and B. Hannon. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(15): 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
  22. Costanza, R., R. de Groot, P. Sutton, S. van der Ploeg, J. Anderson, I. Kubiszewski, S. Farber, R.K. Turner. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ. Chang., 26: 152-158.
  23. Costanza, R., R. de Groot, L. Braat, I. Kubiszewski, L. Fioramonti, P. Sutton, S. Farber, and M. Grasso. 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst. Serv., 28: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
  24. Daily, G.C. 1997. Nature’s Services–Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington D.C.
  25. DANE. 2012. Censo nacional 2005. Proyección de población humana en el municipio de Buenaventura. Valle del Cauca.
  26. Darryl, E., W. Marois and J. Mitsch. 2015. Coastal protection from tsunamis and cyclones provided by mangrove wetlands –a review. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag., 11(1): 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.997292
  27. De Groot, D. 2010. Protecting natural capital for human wellbeing and sustainable development. Science for Environment Policy, DG Environment News Alert, Special Issue Ecosystem Services, 1.
  28. Defeo, O., A. McLachlan, D.S. Schoeman, T.A. Schlacher, J. Dugan, A. Jones, M. Lastra, and F. Scapini. 2009. Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 81: 1-12.
  29. Dias, M., J. Roma, C. Fonseca, M. Pinto, H.N. Cabral, A. Silva, and C. Vinagre. 2016. Intertidal pools as alternative nursery habitats for coastal fishes. Mar. Biol. Res., 12(4): 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2016.1143106
  30. Dominati, E.J. 2014. An ecosystem services approach to the quantification of shallow mass movement erosion and the value of soil conservation practices. Ecosyst. Serv., 9: 204-215.
  31. Doody, J.P. 2012. Sand dune conservation, management and restoration. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin. 306 p.
  32. Duke, N.C., J-O. Meynecke, S. Dittmann, A.M. Ellison, K. Anger, U. Berger, S. Cannicci, K. Diele, K.C. Ewel, C.D. Field, N. Koedam, S.Y. Lee, C. Marchand, I. Nordhaus, and F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2007. A world without mangroves? Science, 317: 41-42.
  33. FAO. 2010. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO, Rome. 214 p.
  34. Gislason, H., M. Sinclair, K. Sainsbury and R. O’Boyle, 2000. Symposium overview: incorporating ecosystem objectives within fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 57: 468-475.
  35. Gowrie, M.N. 2003. Environmental vulnerability index for the island of Tobago, West Indies. Conserv. Ecol., 7(2): 11-19.
  36. Halpern, B.S., K.L. Mcleod, A.A. Rosenberg, and L.B. Crowder. 2008. Managing for cumulative impacts in ecosystem-based management through ocean zoning. Ocean Coast. Manag., 51(3): 203-211.
  37. Hanley, M.E., S.P.G. Hoggart, D.J. Simmonds, A. Bichot, M.A. Colangelo, F. Bozzeda, and R. Trude. 2014. Shifting sands coastal protection by sand banks, beaches and dunes. Coast. Eng., 87: 136-146.
  38. Invemar-Univalle. 2011. El papel de la salinidad en las asociaciones de larvas de organismos marinos en Bahía Málaga (Pacífico colombiano): valoración de la importancia de esa área como salacuna y su comportamiento con otros estuarios en hábitats tropicales. Informe final. Colciencias-Invemar-Univalle, Cali. 47 p.
  39. Invemar-Univalle-Inciva. 2006. Bases científicas y valoración de la biodiversidad marina y costera de Bahía Málaga (Valle del Cauca), como uno de los instrumentos necesarios para que sea considerada un área protegida. Informe final. Colciencias-Invemar-Univalle-Inciva, Cali. 813 p.
  40. IPCC. 2019. Refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 672 p.
  41. Kaly, U., L. Briguglio, H. McLeod, S. Schmall, C. Pratt, and R. Pal. 1999. Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI) to summarise national environmental vulnerability profiles. SOPAC, Suva. 67 p.
  42. King, P.G. and D. Symes. 2004. Potential loss in GNP and GSP from a failure to maintain California’s beaches. Shore Beach, 72(1): 3-7.
  43. King, P.G., C. Nelsen, J.E. Dugan, D.M. Hubbard, and K.L. Martin. 2018. Valuing beach ecosystems in an age of retreat. Shore Beach, 86(4): 45-59.
  44. Laurans, Y., N. Pascal, T. Binet, L. Brander, E. Clua, G. David, D. Rojat, and A. Seidl. 2013. Economic valuation of ecosystem services from coral reefs in the South Pacific: taking stock of recent experience. Journal Environ. Manag., 116: 135-144.
  45. Liquete, C., C. Piroddi, E.G. Drakou, L. Gurney, S. Katsanevakis, A. Charef, and B. Egoh. 2013. Current status and future prospects for the assessment of marine and coastal ecosystem services: a systematic review. Plos One, 8(7), e67737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067737
  46. Marcelli, M., S. Scani, F. Manfredi, E. Mancini, and F. Carli. 2018. A benthic zonation system as a fundamental tool for natural capital assessment in a marine environment: a case study in the Northern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy. Sustainability, 10(3786): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103786
  47. Mazda, Y., M. Magi, Y. Ikeda, T. Kurokawa, and T. Asano. 2006. Wave reduction in a mangrove forest dominated by Sonneratia sp. Wetl Ecol. Manag., 14: 365-378.
  48. McCartney, M., M. Finlayson, and S. de Silva. 2015. Sustainable development and ecosystem services. Brief for GSDR 2015.
  49. Metcalf, S.J., E.I. Van Putten, S. Frusher, N.A. Marshall, M. Tull, N. Caputi, M. Haward, A.J. Hobday, N.J. Holbrook, S.M. Jennings, G.T. Pecl and J.L. Shaw. 2015. Measuring the vulnerability of marine social-ecological systems: a prerequisite for the identification of climate change adaptations. Ecol. Soc., 20(2): 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07509-200235
  50. Moberg, F. and C. Folke. 1999. Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecol. Econ., 29(1): 215-233.
  51. Mooney, H.A. and P.R. Ehrlich. 1997. Ecosystem services: a fragmentary history. 11-19. In G.C. Daily (Ed.). Nature’s Services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  52. Mukherjee, N., W.J. Sutherland, L. Dicks, and J. Huge. 2014. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast Asia: a meta-analysis and value transfer application ecosystem service valuations of mangrove ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises. Plos One, 9(9): e107706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111386
  53. Mumby, P., I. Chollett, Y. Bozec and N.H. Wolff. 2014. Ecological resilience, robustness and vulnerability: how do these concepts benefit ecosystem management? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 7: 22-27.
  54. Olivo, M.L., A. Martin, V. Saez-Saez, and A. Soto. 2011. Vulnerabilidad al incremento del nivel del mar: pérdida de tierra en el área, cabo Codera-Laguna de Tacarigua, estado Miranda, Venezuela. Terra Nueva Etapa, 27: 125-145.
  55. Oppenheimer, M., M. Campos, R. Warren, J. Birkmann, G. Luber, B. O’Neill and K. Takahashi. 2014. Emergent risks and key vulnerabilities. 1039-1099. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York.
  56. Osland, M.J., N.M. Enwright, R.H. Day, C.A. Gabler, C.L. Stagg, and J.B. Grace. 2016. Beyond just sea-level rise: considering macroclimatic drivers within coastal wetland vulnerability assessments to climate change. Glob. Change Biol., 22: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13084
  57. Palacios, M.L. and J.R. Cantera. 2017. Mangrove timber use as an ecosystem service in the Colombian Pacific. Hydrobiologia, 803(1): 345-358.
  58. Palacios, M.L., Cantera J.R., and Peña E. J. 2019. Carbon stocks in mangrove forests of the Colombian Pacific. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 227: 1-7.
  59. Posada, B.O.P., W.H. Pineda y G.G. Ospitia. 2009. Diagnóstico de la erosión y sedimentación en la zona costera del Pacífico colombiano. Invemar, Santa Marta. 148 p.
  60. Riascos, J.M., N. Valencia, E.J. Peña, and J.R. Cantera. 2019. Inhabiting the technosphere: the encroachment of anthropogenic marine litter in Neotropical mangrove forests and its use as habitat by microbenthic biota. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 142: 559-568.
  61. Robertson, H.A. and T.K. McGee. 2003. Applying local knowledge: the contribution of oral history to wetland rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, Australia. J. Environ. Manag., 69(3): 275-87.
  62. Rojas, A.M., C.A. Ruiz-Agudelo, M.C. Diazgranados, H. Polanco, and R. Anderson, R. 2019. Approach to an integral valuation of mangrove’s ecosystem services in a marine protected area. Colombian Pacific region. Journal Environ. Econ. Policy, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2019.1584127
  63. Rubio, E. 1984. Preliminary taxonomic study of Bahía Malaga’s, Colombia Icthyofauna. Cespedesia, 13(47-48): 97-111.
  64. Sasaki, T., T. Furukawa, Y. Iwasaki, M. Seto, M., and A.S. Mori. 2015. Perspectives for ecosystem management based on ecosystem resilience and ecological thresholds against multiple and stochastic disturbances. Ecol. Indic., 57: 395-408.
  65. Schröter, D., M.J. Metzger, W. Cramer, and R. Leemans. 2004. Vulnerability assessment-analysing the human-environment system in the face of global environmental change. ESS Bulletin, 2(2): 11-17.
  66. Schumacher, E. 1973. Small is beautiful. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
  67. Simm, J. 1996. Beach Management Manual. CIRIA, London. 233 p.
  68. Spalding, M. and C.L. Parrett. 2019. Global patterns in mangrove recreation and tourism. Mar. Policy, 110: 103540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103540
  69. Spears, B., S.C. Ives, D.G. Angeler, C.R. Allen, S. Birk, L. Carvalho, S. Cavers, F. Daunt, R.D. Morton, M.J.O. Pocock, G. Rhodes, and S.J. Thackeray. 2015. Effective management of ecological resilience – are we there yet? J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12497
  70. Steinmuller, H.E. and L.G. Chambers. 2019. Characterization of coastal wetland soil organic matter: implications for wetland submergence. Sci. Total Environ, 677: 648-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.405
  71. Thompson, B.S. and S.M. Rog. 2019. Beyond ecosystem services: using charismatic megafauna as flagship species for mangrove forest conservation. Environ. Sci. Policy, 102: 9-17.
  72. Turner II, B.L., R.E. Kasperson, P.A. Matson, J.J. Mccarthy, R.W. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, J.X. Kasperson, A. Luers, M.L. Martello, C. Polsky, A. Pulsipher, and A. Schiller. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. PNAS, 100(14): 8074-8079.
  73. Univalle. 2010. Environmental and social pre-feasibility study on the construction of a deepwater port in Uramba. Pacífico colombiano. Final report. Univalle, Cali. 290 p.
  74. Veidemane, K. 2019. Contribution of ecosystem services to achievement of the sustainable development goals. Proceedings 2019, 30(1): 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019030008
  75. Violante, C. 2009. Rocky coast: geological constraints for hazard assessment. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ., 322(1): 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP322.1
  76. Vo, Q.T., C. Kuenzer, Q.M. Vo, F. Moder, and N. Oppelt. 2012. Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic., 23: 431-446.
  77. Weißhuhn, P., F. Müller, and H. Wiggering. 2018. Ecosystem vulnerability review: proposal of an interdisciplinary ecosystem assessment approach. Environ. Manag., 61: 904-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1023-8
  78. Wilson, J.G. 2005. The intertidal ecosystem: The value of Ireland’s shores. Royal Irish Academy. 203 p.
  79. Wood, S.J.R., S.K. Jones, J.A. Jhonson, K.A. Brauman, R. Chaplin-Kramer, A. Fremier, E. Girvetz, L.J. Gordon, C.V. Kappel, L. Mandle, M. Mulligan, P. O’Farrel, W.K. Smith, L. Willemen, W. Zhang, and F.A. DeClerck. 2018. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosyst. Serv., 29: 70-82.
  80. Woodhead, A.J., C.C. Hicks, A.V. Norström, G.J. Gareth, and N.J. Graham. 2019. Coral reef ecosystem services in the Anthropocene. Funct. Ecol., 33(6): 1023-1034.
  81. Yáñez-Arancibia, A., R.R. Twilley, and A.L. Lara-Domínguez. 1998. Los ecosistemas de manglar frente al cambio climático global. Madera Bosques, 4(2): 3-19.
  82. Zacharias, M.A. and E.J. Gregr. 2005. Sensitivity and Vulnerability in Marine Environments: an approach to identifying vulnerable marine areas. Conserv. Biol., 19(1): 86-97.

Artículos similares

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

También puede Iniciar una búsqueda de similitud avanzada para este artículo.